Brazil vs Zimbabwe: 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, annual growth rate
Brazil
-100 % change on previous year
in 2006
Zimbabwe
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Brazil rank
86th
Zimbabwe rank
86th
07_Multilateral loans, IMF, annual growth rate over time
- Brazil
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Brazil currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 128 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -45.32 % change on previous year | 13.73 % change on previous year | 59.05 % change on previous year | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 69.16 % change on previous year | -10.8 % change on previous year | 79.96 % change on previous year | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 07_multilateral loans, imf, annual growth rate, Brazil or Zimbabwe?
- Brazil, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2006.
- What is the difference in 07_multilateral loans, imf, annual growth rate between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2006.
- How do Brazil and Zimbabwe rank globally for 07_multilateral loans, imf, annual growth rate?
- Brazil ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 128 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 07_Multilateral loans, IMF, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in 07_Multilateral loans, IMF. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.